LB - Lamb Auto 0726 Chevy Credit

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state September 27, 2016

7/7/2010 8:15:00 AM
Feds file lawsuit against Arizona; ask judge to block SB1070
Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who crafted the law and pushed it through the Legislature said the lawsuit has only one purpose.
Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who crafted the law and pushed it through the Legislature said the lawsuit has only one purpose.

"This is about the Obamas' policy of non-enforcement,' he said. "This interferes with their plan for amnesty.'
Barack Obama
Barack Obama

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services

PHOENIX -- The Department of Justice filed suit Tuesday, asking a federal judge to block Arizona's new law aimed at illegal immigrants from taking effect.

Legal papers filed in U.S. District Court in Phoenix contend SB 1070 "is preempted by federal law and therefore violates the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution.' The lawsuit says the legislation conflicts with the federal government's need to balance the competing interests of enforcing federal immigration law with the country's diplomatic relations with other countries, including Mexico.

"SB 1070 ... attempts to second-guess federal policies and re-order federal priorities in the area of immigration enforcement and to directly regulate immigration and the condition of an alien's entry and presence in the United States despite the fact that those subjects are federal domains and do not involve any legitimate state interest,' wrote Assistant Attorney General Tony West who heads the civil division of the Department of Justice.

But Sen. Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, who crafted the law and pushed it through the Legislature said the lawsuit has only one purpose.

"This is about the Obamas' policy of non-enforcement,' he said. "This interferes with their plan for amnesty.'

He said the administration has no interest in dealing with illegal immigration itself and now wants to block Arizona from doing what the federal government refuses to do.

"They are complicit,' he said of the administration.

"They are aiding and abetting the enemy,' Pearce said and are violating their oath of office. "They ought to be impeached.'

Gov. Jan Brewer, in a prepared response, said she believes the law is ``both reasonable and constitutional.'

She also rejected the contention that SB 1070 is preempted by federal law, saying it is ``designed to complement, not supplant, enforcement of federal immigration laws.'

Brewer said she was glad the federal lawsuit did not claim the law will lead to racial profiling, a claim in some of the five other lawsuits already filed challenging the law.

But that may be just a temporary victory: A top justice department official said Tuesday that's a separate legal issue. He said if SB 1070 does take effect as scheduled on July 29, his agency's civil rights division will monitor how the law is implemented and, if necessary, file a separate action.

Pinal County Attorney James Walsh said the latest filing may be stronger than the other five lawsuits.

He said one of the key arguments in all of them is whether federal laws preempt the Arizona statute. But Walsh, a former assistant state attorney general, said none of the plaintiffs in those other claims may have legal standing or ability to show any specific harm on the issue of federal supremacy, something the federal government is not require to prove.

The law requires police who have stopped someone to check their immigration status if there is "reasonable suspicion' they are in this country illegally. It also imposes criminal penalties on foreigners who fail to federally register or carry their immigration documents.

Other provisions make it a state crime for undocumented workers to seek employment in Arizona and for people to knowingly harbor or transport those who are illegal immigrants.

Central to the case is whether the Arizona law interferes with what West said is the need of the federal government to decide exactly how and when to enforce immigration laws.

"Assuring effective enforcement of the provisions against illegal immigration and unlawful presence is a highly important interest,' West wrote. "But it is not the singular goal of federal immigration laws.

He said the laws also take into account "uniquely national interests' like facilitating trade and commerce, welcoming foreign nationals who visit, and making sure the treatment of foreign nationals here ``does not harm our foreign relations with the countries form which they come or jeopardize the treatment of U.S. citizens abroad.'

Pearce said SB 1070 simply lets the state enforce existing federal immigration laws. But West said that's not the case.

For example, he said federal law does make it illegal to hire an undocumented worker. And there are separate laws aimed at would-be workers who present presenting fraudulent documents.

But nothing in any of those laws, West said, makes it a crime for an illegal immigrant to seek work.

"In fact (Congress) decided that criminal sanctions for seeking or obtaining employment would run counter to the purposes of the immigration system,' he wrote.

Pearce said West is off base with his objections.

"It's a felony to hire them,' he said. "So it ought to be a crime to solicit.'

West had similar problems with the requirement of police to check the immigration status of those they suspect are in this country illegally. At the same time, SB 1070 also says any legal Arizona resident can file suit against any official or agency that adopts or implements a policy that restricts enforcement of federal immigration laws.

He said that undermines what had been the discretion of police of whether to verify someone's immigration status. Nor was West convinced that the requirement for "reasonable suspicion' is sufficient to protect rights.

"Arizona's alien inspection scheme therefore will subject lawful aliens to the possibility of inquisitorial practices and police surveillance, a form of treatment which Congress has plainly guarded against in crafting a balanced, federally-directed immigration enforcement scheme.'

Both Brewer and Pearce also chided the Obama administration for what they see is a selective approach to claiming federal supremacy in enforcing immigration laws. Pearce said that ignores various local policies and practices that now instruct police not to inquire about someone's immigration status.

"These patchwork local 'sanctuary' policies instruct the police not to cooperate with federal immigration officials,' Brewer said.

In a prepared statement, Attorney General Eric Holder said Arizonans "are understandably frustrated with illegal immigration.' And he said the federal government has a responsibility to comprehensively address those concerns.

"But diverting federal resources away from dangerous aliens such as terrorism suspects and aliens with criminal records will impact the entire country s safety,' the statement said.

"Setting immigration policy and enforcing immigration laws is a national responsibility,' Holder continued. "Seeking to address the issue through a patchwork of state laws will only create more problems than it solves.'

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano pointed out that, as Arizona governor, she vetoed similar bills.

"They would have diverted critical law enforcement resources from the most serious threats to public safety and undermined the vital trust between local jurisdictions and the communities they serve,' her statement said.

ICT - Lamb Auto 0803 Nissan Better Dealership
Related Stories:
• Reaction to Department of Justice lawsuit:
• Grijalva, Giffords take opposing views on immigration lawsuit against Arizona
• Southern Arizona lawmen say immigration law hurts their efforts
• My Turn: Sensible outline for immigration reform

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Armed Cornville man confronts burglar; suspect begs homeowner not to shoot (4394 views)

•   Young BB-gun car shooter sentenced (2630 views)

•   LeMain Development stirs up controversy over limited parking, balconies, building height (2137 views)

•   Colorado Springs mayor urges Arizonans to vote No on legalized marijuana (1967 views)

•   Court Docket Sept. 22, 2016 (1940 views)

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Coldwell Banker 67383804

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved