PHOENIX -- Saying procedures were not followed, an administrative law judge on Tuesday threw out charges that Attorney General Tom Horne and an aide violated state campaign finance laws.
Tammy Eigenheer did not address the contention by Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery that Horne had illegally coordinated his 2010 election campaign with Kathleen Winn, now on Horne's payroll, who was heading what was billed as an independent expenditure committee. That followed an investigation of Horne by the FBI.
Instead, Eigenheer said that Secretary of State Ken Bennett, charged with reviewing campaign violations, should never have referred the case to Montgomery in the first place. She pointed out that state law requires those complaints to go to the Attorney General's Office -- headed by Horne.
Montgomery argued that made no sense, given the "obvious conflict.' And he said Bennett was entitled to seek out someone else to pursue the matter.
Eigenheer disagreed, saying the law is clear. And she said it would be up to Horne's office to disqualify itself from the inquiry, not the option of either Bennett or Montgomery.
She also rejected a separate contention by Montgomery that his office has authority of its own to pursue campaign finance violations.
Jerry Cobb, Montgomery's spokesman, said an appeal of Tuesday's ruling is planned.
Nothing in state law prohibits any group from conducting a separate campaign for or against a candidate. But the law says these must be independent, with no coordination between the candidate and those running the committee.
The FBI, acting on a tip, concluded that was not the case for Horne's campaign.
What the federal agency came up with, according to Bennett, were emails that "unquestionably demonstrate Attorney General Horne actively seeking funds for the independent expenditure committee.'
Montgomery agreed, saying there were "contemporaneous emails and telephone conversations on how much money was expected from this particular source of funds.'
There was also information shared about what polling had shown needed to be the message of the independent campaign's television ad being purchased by Winn's committee. And Montgomery said there were communications "about why some of the messaging needed to be changed.'
Horne said at the time that investigators "misread' the emails.
For example, he said there is a notation on an email that Winn was sending to her consultant about what she wanted in the TV ad. And Horne said there's also a notation that Winn made when, at the same time, she was on the phone with Horne.
"We checked the records and she was on the phone with me about something else,' he said.
Posted: Monday, March 25, 2013
Article comment by:
How About That
Must be nice to have friends in high places, eh Tom? Now if the citizens will just forget about that "misunderstanding" with the hit and run/ mistress thing, Tom can get back to working against the people of Arizona!!
Posted: Thursday, March 21, 2013
Article comment by:
Carl Nye - Jerome
Just wondering - as the top person in the state's legal system, does Horne have any control or influence over the administrative law judge?