LB - RoomStore 0503

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state May 26, 2016

12/11/2013 12:56:00 PM
Center for Reproductive Rights asks Supreme Court to block Arizona abortion law

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services

PHOENIX -- Arizona is taking center stage in the fight over how far state lawmakers can go to curb abortion rights.

The battle was joined this week when the Center for Reproductive Rights asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block Arizona from enforcing its ban on the procedure at 20 weeks. That is in direct response to a petition to the justices filed this summer by Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery urging them to declare the state restriction legal.

What the high court ultimately decides will affect more than the rights of women in Arizona.

Janet Crepps, the lead attorney for foes of the law, noted that other states have adopted similar laws. But she said this is the first -- and for the moment, the only -- case to get to the Supreme Court.

That means what the Supreme Court decides will ultimately have nationwide implications.

Until 2012, Arizona regulated but did not ban any abortions prior to viability, something that Crepps said occurs around the 24th week after a woman's last menstrual cycle. And no one has argued it happens before 22 weeks.

But state legislators, pushed by Sen. Kimberly Yee, R-Phoenix, approved the 20-week ban, saying they now have evidence that a fetus at 20 weeks can feel pain. They also cited testimony of a higher risk of the procedure to a woman at that point.

The only exceptions are for conditions that would result in the woman's death or "serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.'

Crepps, representing several Arizona doctors who perform abortions beyond 20 weeks, filed suit. She said a majority of their patients at that point do so due either to fetal abnormalities or to protect their health.

While a trial judge ruled the law valid, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the statute runs directly contrary to the historic precedent-setting 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade which concluded the government cannot interfere with a woman's right to an abortion prior to viability. So in August, Montgomery asked the high court to intercede.

Crepps, in her legal filing this week, said the justices should rebuff the request.

"The court has identified this, that the state can't ban abortion prior to viability, as a central tenet, core component, the heart of the decision in Roe v. Wade,' said Crepps, the lead attorney for a legal team that also includes the American Civil Liberties Union.

"What the state is asking for is not just a little bit of a moving of the line,' Crepps continued. "They're asking essentially for the court to throw out the whole basis of its (earlier) holdings.'

The question of whether the justices agree to hear the case could depend on how they believe things have changed since 1973 -- and whether any of that is legally relevant.

Montgomery, in his legal filings this past summer, said there is evidence that the risk to a woman from the procedure is greater at 24 weeks than it is at 20. He argued that gives state lawmakers the legal right to intercede.

Crepps said there's nothing new there.

"That the risks of abortion increase as pregnancy advances has always been known to this court,' she told the justices. Crepps said that was inherent in the original Roe v. Wade ruling which said that viability marks the "earliest point' where the state can justify a ban.

More to the point, Crepps said this is none of business of Arizona lawmakers.

"It is for a woman, and not the state, to weigh medical risks and other equally important factors to determine whether or not to continue her pre-viability pregnancy,' she wrote. Anyway, Crepps said, there is "simply no credible evidence that ... legal induced abortion is riskier for a woman at 20 weeks than carrying to term.'

And Crepps dismissed the claims of fetal pain as having been "rejected by the major medical organizations in the field to address the question.'

Crepps said she is not saying the line for state intervention has to remain at 24 weeks. In fact, she noted, viability in 1973 was considered to be closer to 28 weeks.

But Crepps said the justices should not move the point of absolute protection of a woman's right to choose unless and until there is medical evidence of viability at an earlier point.

Crepps also warned the justices of the dangerous precedent she believes would be set if they accepted Arizona's arguments that legislative findings of maternal health and fetal pain entitle state lawmakers to impose new restrictions.

"If a legislature could ban abortion weeks before viability based on findings with such meager medical support, then the right of a woman to make this most personal decision would be subject to majority rule as surely as if it had no constitutional protection whatsoever,' Crepps wrote. And that, she said, would essentially invalidate the 1973 ruling declaring pre-viability abortion legal and that there would be "no limit on when a state may wrest from a woman and her family the decision of whether to continue or to end a pregnancy.'

That change, said Crepps, should be avoided.

"Two generations of American women and families have come of age, depending on constitutional protection for their reproductive decisions,' she said.

Taylor Waste

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Police soon will have one more reason to pull you over (4526 views)

•   What's hot in Verde Valley job market? (2837 views)

•   Cornville man charged with child molestation seeks plea (2761 views)

•   Motorcycle rider suffers head injuries in crash (2120 views)

•   Seasonal warning: never leave dog in parked car (2084 views)

Reader Comments

Posted: Thursday, December 12, 2013
Article comment by: Slater slater

The End is Near.

Posted: Thursday, December 12, 2013
Article comment by: Janet Crepps, the lead attorney ....

should be a voice for ALL women, men, children,
babies and pre-borns...for in this country they are
ALL protected by the same constitution...which
recognizes the right to life.

Thanks and Good Luck.

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
HSE - Father Son Look a Like Contest
HSE - Readers Choice 300x100
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Yavapai College 0523 Industrial Machine 728x90

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved