LB - Yavapai Herbal Services

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state September 30, 2016


11/25/2013 2:15:00 PM
Bennett changes mind on campaign donation limits
Secretary of State Ken Bennett
Secretary of State Ken Bennett

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services


PHOENIX -- Reversing his earlier stance, Secretary of State Ken Bennett now wants to keep caps in place on what candidates can take from individuals and special interests, at least for the time being.

In legal papers filed with the Arizona Supreme Court, Bennett acknowledged that he initially supported the bid by Republican legislative leaders to allow much higher limits -- and, in some cases, no limits at all -- on what donors can give and candidates can accept. In fact, his attorney argued to the state Court of Appeals that the Republican-controlled Legislature was legally entitled to make the changes.

The appellate court disagreed, blocking the law -- and the higher limits -- from taking effect.

Now the GOP leaders want the state's high court to overrule the appellate court.

But they conceded a full-blown review of the issue could take months. So they are asking the justices to allow the law to be implemented while the case plays out in court.

But Bennett, through his lawyer, told the justices that would be a bad idea.

"The public has a significant interest in the smooth function of an election,' wrote attorney David Weinzweig for the secretary of state. He said changing the rules now -- which actually would be for third time -- would result in "uncertainty and chaos.'

Bennett said that he has worked since the appellate court ruling to inform both candidates and contributors that they are bound by what was on the books until September.

"Another change in regulations would undo those efforts and further upend Arizona's campaign finance system,' he said.

What the high court decides could ultimately affect the outcome of next year's political races, as it will determine how much candidates running with private dollars can raise.

Until this year, candidates for legislative office have been able to collect no more than $440 from any one individual or political action committee. That limit has been $912 for those seeking statewide office.

The legislation raises that to $4,000 from any one source for all candidates.

Potentially more significant, the measure repeals a cap of $14,688 on how much candidates can take from all PACs for any election, as well as a $6,390 lid on the amount any one individual or PAC can give to all candidates in any year.

The move was challenged by the Citizens Clean Election Commission, which charged that these limits were tied to the voluntary system of public financing. Thomas Collins, the commission's executive director, said the fact that system was adopted in 1998 by voters means changes can be made only by taking the issue back to voters or with a three-fourths vote of the Legislature, something it did not get.

A trial judge disagreed. That allowed the higher limits to take effect -- but only for 32 days until the Court of Appeals ruled they are not legal, enjoined the law from being enforced and reinstated the lower limits. That led to proponents seeking Supreme Court review.

Attorney Mike Liburdi, who represents the Republican legislators, said living with the lower limits creates a hardship on not only them but members of the public who might want to give to their campaigns or those of other politicians.

He also argued that the lower limits infringe on the First Amendment rights of both contributors and candidates. And Liburdi said it is illegal to tell candidates for election in 2014 their constitutional rights do not apply.

Collins denied the existing limits are unconstitutionally low or that there is a First Amendment right of politicians to take more money from any one source.

In his legal filings, Bennett does not address that issue. Instead, he said his interest is consistency.

He said the purpose of an injunction is to "preserve the status quo' while an issue is litigated. But in this case, Bennett said, supporters of the law want to immediately reinstate the contribution and donation limits that actually had existed for just 32 days.

He said it is better to leave the old limits in place until there is a final resolution of the matter.

ICT - Lamb Auto 0803 Nissan Better Dealership

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Medical effects of hemp-derived CBD to be explored (2213 views)

•   1st analysis shows successful 2016 Thunder Valley Rally (2182 views)

•   Mingus King & Queen (2082 views)

•   $40K reward for robbery information (1804 views)

•   City Council OK's LeMain decks, annexation plan (1526 views)



Reader Comments

Posted: Monday, December 2, 2013
Article comment by: Mary Jane

At least Republicans have come out of the closet and no longer make any pretenses about what is important, MONEY!

Next change they propose will be to auction off their votes to the highest bidder. A sort of political E-Bay where you select how much you are willing to pay them to vote for your position. Bidding will be fast and furious, much more exciting than election results!

I can already hear many of you saying, "that's how they do it now, how does that change anything?" Answer: It will be Legal, even mandatory! After all, Corporate bribes are free speech made by 'real people'.

Laissez Faire and Caveat Emptor to ALL!!!


Posted: Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Article comment by:

...corporations are individuals, and, it has been ruled, can have a religion.

Soon, republican'ts will elevate Money to that of a consecrated host and laws will be passed to make sure we genuflect in Its Holy Presence.

Thanks, repubs, thanks a lot.

pf





Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
Mingus Gem and Mineral 0902 729x90

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, verdenews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved