LB - Yavapai College 0523 Industrial Machine 728x90

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state May 24, 2016


6/25/2013 10:45:00 AM
Arizona no longer needs fed's approval on changes to voting law

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services


PHOENIX -- Arizona no longer needs to get federal government sign-off on changes in its voting law.

The U.S. Supreme Court Tuesday morning overturned a section of the Voting Rights Act that said that certain states and counties with a history of discrimination must submit any alterations to the Department of Justice for pre-clearance. That list of nine states has included Arizona based on some of its practices dating as late as the 1960s.

Chief Justice Roberts, writing for the majority, said there is no longer any basis for singling out some states for special treatment.

But Roberts was careful to say that other sections of the Voting Rights Act survive -- and that this is not a license for states to enact new discriminatory laws.

Roberts said the U.S. Constitution makes federal laws supreme and that state laws may not undermine them.

"The federal government does not, however, have a general right to review and veto state enactments before they go into effect,' he wrote. In fact, Robert said, the Constitutional Convention considered such authority but rejected that, instead saying state laws should be allowed to take effect "subject to later challenge under the Supremacy Clause.'

And Roberts said states remain not only sovereignty but are constitutionally equal to each other.

The problem here, Roberts said, is this provision of the Voting Rights Act applies to only some states. And that, he said, creates an inequity.

For most states, changes in voting laws are put into effect immediately. If there is a challenge, it is up to the party contesting them to make the case and prove the discrimination.

The Voting Rights Act turns that on its head, Robert said, forcing Arizona and other affected states to first prove that any change is not discriminatory.

Roberts acknowledged the high court upheld the law in 1966. But he said there were "exceptional circumstances' at that time.

That included the fact that some states had enacted various requirements and tests "specifically designed' to prevent African-Americans from voting. And Roberts said case-by-case challenges "proved inadequate' because the states that were sued "merely switched to discriminatory devices now covered by the federal decree' or simply defined and evaded court orders.

Now, half a century later, Roberts said things have changed, at least in part because of the Voting Rights Act.

Tuesday's decision drew criticism from Judge Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

She pointed to the majority's concession that the formulas set by Congress to determine which states needed their voting laws precleared made sense when enacted. And Ginsburg agreed with Roberts that the Voting Rights Act has been a success in curbing discrimination.

Ginsburg said Tuesday's ruling, in essence, said the success of all that means it is no longer needed, a conclusion she and three other justices refuse to accept.

The original law covered states with things like literacy and knowledge tests and "good moral character' requirements. Arizona was not part of the original law which initially covered six states and various counties, including one in Arizona.

Several states were added in the 1970 renewal based on having a voting test and voter registration less than 60 percent.

Then in 1975, Congress extended the act again based on having a voting test and low voter turnout in more recent elections. More significant for Arizona was defining a voting "test' to include providing English-only voting materials in places where more than 5 percent of voting-age citizens spoke a single language other than English. That swept in Arizona as a "covered jurisdiction' needing preclearance of voting law changes.

But there had been allegations of harassment of black and Hispanic voters going back before then organized by the state Republican Party.

Some of those came up initially during 1972 confirmation hearings of William Rehnquist to be a justice of the Supreme Court where there were reports he was involved in efforts to challenge minority voters at polling places. It became part of the hearings years later when he was nominated as chief justice.

Taylor Waste

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Police soon will have one more reason to pull you over (4332 views)

•   'A Great Celebration' -- Mingus seniors prepare for graduation, commemorate scholarships and awards (3523 views)

•   Dowling steps down; Cottonwood election promises new interest (2911 views)

•   New trial sought for Jack Rider (2695 views)

•   What's hot in Verde Valley job market? (2684 views)



Reader Comments

Posted: Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Article comment by: And the AZ majority GOP legislature dances with glee in 5...4...3...2..1..

And let the destruction of voting rights in AZ begin.

So much for the independent redistricting commission that the citizens voted for as well.

Thank you supreme court... the only thing they can't rule on is that the GOP is a dying party that is on a slow spiral down the drain no matter how they change voting.



Posted: Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Article comment by: Oh My God

Let us all watch enthralled as the 90 dwarves figure out a way to ensure that only republican white males can access the voting booths of the state.



Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
HSE - Father Son Look a Like Contest
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Yavapai Herbal Services

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, verdenews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved