LB - VVMC FMC mach solutions

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state July 27, 2015


6/20/2013 8:18:00 AM
GOP tweaks election laws to squeeze out Libertarians

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services


PHOENIX -- Contending one and maybe two congressional races were stolen from them, Republican legislators have approved a measure to finesse election laws to keep out the Libertarians who they say are taking votes from their candidates.

The change, tucked into a much larger set of revisions to election laws, would sharply increase the number of signatures that Libertarian and Green Party candidates need just to get on the ballot for their own legislative and congressional primaries.

Barry Hess, the Libertarian Party's former candidate for governor, said in most cases the number of signatures required is far more than the number of people actually registered in most districts. He said unless these minor parties could find independents willing to help them get on the ballot, it would create an "insurmountable obstacle' to any minor party candidate getting nominated, much less being on the general election ballot.

But Rep. J.D. Mesnard, R-Chandler, admitted publicly that's precisely the purpose of the change. And the real goal is creating an easier path for GOP candidates to win.

Mesnard, in a late-night bid on the House floor last week on to corral necessary votes for the change, argued that people try to "manipulate the outcome of elections by putting third-party candidates on the ballot.'

"All they have to do right now is get a dozen or 15 signatures and on the ballot they go,' Mesnard said, saying he was aiming his comments at the Republicans who control the Legislature. And he claimed that at least one congressional race and maybe two did not go "in the direction I would have liked to have seen them go' -- and would have gone, Mesnard contends, had this law been in place last year.

In CD 1, Republican Jonathan Paton fell short in his bid to oust incumbent Democrat Ann Kirkpatrick. Paton garnered 113,594 votes against 122,774 for Kirkpatrick.

But Libertarian Kim Allen picked up 15,227 votes -- votes that Mesnard contended likely would have gone to Paton to help him win.

Similarly, in the newly created CD 9, Democrat Kyrsten Sinema bested Republican Vernon Parker by 10,251 votes, with Libertarian Powell Gammill tallying 16,620.

Mesnard said upping the signature requirements for minor parties makes these races "much less vulnerable to sham candidates and manipulation.'

And to drive the point home, Mesnard said the legislation should be supported by Republicans who were "disappointed in the outcome' of those races.'

"So I strongly urge folks, at least in my party, who looked at the last election in November of 2012 and were disappointed with the outcome, and looked at a couple of the third-party candidates that were in there and how they impacted us in a detrimental way' to support the legislation.

And to drive home the point to his GOP colleagues, he noted this change applies not only to congressional races but also to legislative battles. Mesnard told them that if they didn't vote for this change, they could be personally and directly affected in their next race.

"I can't believe we wouldn't see the benefit of this,' Mesnard told fellow Republicans.

The change is all about numbers.

Under existing law, candidates for each party have to gather signatures equal to one-half of one percent of the party's voter registration.

Last election, for example, that meant Republicans wanting to run in the First Congressional District needed 568 signatures. Democrats needed 721 to get on the ballot. And Libertarians needed just 12.

This legislation changes the percentage for all to one-sixth of one percent of the total voter registration, or 618.

"It's not fair, or even potentially positive or productive,' Hess said, calling the provision "petty political games.'

Rep. Eddie Farnsworth, R-Gilbert, a key proponent of the change, said it's only fair that all candidates have the same hurdle to get nominated.

Hess said even if Farnsworth's intentions were not to cripple the minor parties, all that is irrelevant.

"I can't imagine trying to win elections like this,' Hess said.

The Libertarians are not alone. Angel Torres, chairman of the Arizona Green Party, also registered his objections.

The measure, HB 2305, is currently on the desk of Gov. Jan Brewer, a Republican like Mesnard. But Matthew Benson, her press aide, said his boss is still reviewing the measure and has made no decisions.

If Brewer signs it, there are some other options. D.J. Quinlan, chairman of the Arizona Democratic Party, said his organization might finance a referendum to take the issue to voters. And Rep. Steve Gallardo, D-Phoenix, said a legal challenge remains possible, not only to this provision but other changes in the law including alterations to procedures for early ballots.

Mesnard's logic in urging Republicans to support the change presumes that most of those votes for Allen would have gone to Paton. Even the GOP candidate isn't convinced that's the case.

"I never met a Libertarian who supported Obamacare,' Paton said, something Kirkpatrick supported and he opposed. Allen said during the race he supports a "single-payer' system but would not repeal the Affordable Care Act.

Allen also took some other positions which were decidedly contrary to those being espoused by Paton and Republicans.

He espoused expanding Medicaid to make more people eligible. And Allen said he would have voted against SB 1070, the 2010 legislation aimed at giving police more power to detain and arrest people suspected of being in his country illegally.

Hess bristled at the idea that somehow Libertarians are "spoilers' in any race.

"I don't believe there is such a thing as a 'spoiler,' ' he said, saying all the candidates of all the parties are working the same "fishing pool' in the general election to get voter support.

Specific races aside, Hess said it's wrong for the Republican-controlled Legislature to use its powers this way. And Hess said it shows a fundamental misunderstanding of the primary process -- and even the role of the parties.

"The primary is just to put the people on the ballot to give the public an opportunity to vote for different perceptions,' he said. Hess said upping the signature requirements as a sign of whether a candidate has broad enough support to be on the ballot is effectively moving the general election into the primary -- and then leaving voices other than the major parties out of the general election where it really matters.

Taylor Waste

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Guilty - except insane? (1591 views)

•   Used cars delivered to Steve Coury's GMC dealership (1472 views)

•   Cottonwood hears plans for proposed National Monument (1406 views)

•   DK Ranch donation a 'win-win' (1316 views)

•   Update: Cottonwood upskirt photographer James Hickey arrested in Flagstaff (1304 views)



Reader Comments

Posted: Monday, June 24, 2013
Article comment by: @ Carl Nye

Well, this was to be expected when the party in power failed to get the Top Two primary past the voters. And I'm not sure swelling it's numbers with RINOs would change the stranglehold neo-cons have on both majority parties.

I think minority factions had better roll up their sleeves and hustle up a few more card-carrying members. The signature differential is rather silly, especially when those signatures are being collected on the primary ballots. This does cost money, time, and county registrar aggravation.

& @ Frank Henry
How do you spell "instant runoff"?


Posted: Friday, June 21, 2013
Article comment by: Frank Henry

The Democrat and Republican parties are in
fact minority parties....and both have an assume
idea that only they are qualify to hold office,
strange, ain't it.

Maybe some day we will put the Top Two
primary/run-off election in place of the present
"major parties" primaries we now have.

The the Top Two primary all candidates running
for office will be placed on the same ballot.
The top two vote geters will move forward to
the general election...the winner would then
take the seat.

The political parties/persuasions will play an
important role in campaign activities pushing
for their ideas and their people.


Posted: Thursday, June 20, 2013
Article comment by: David In Cottonwood

Just one more reason why I'm happy I left the Republican Party. What a bunch of BS.

Posted: Thursday, June 20, 2013
Article comment by: AZ Republicans: Democracy

at its worst.

pf


Posted: Thursday, June 20, 2013
Article comment by: Carl Nye

What's in a name? Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green. Since the Republicans have blatantly changed the laws to make it more difficult for minority parties to put candidates on the ballot, I suggest considering an alternative idea.

What if everyone, I mean 100%, of the voters in the state all changed their registration to Republican. Everyone. It's only a name. Then since this would automatically get all candidates on the ballot, RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) could nominate all their favorite candidates and the primary would be a wild race.

If you can't fight them, join them. Then work within the "system" to get what you want.

Just a thought.




Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Coldwell Banker

© Copyright 2015 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, verdenews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2015 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved