LB - Coldwell Banker 1019

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state May 28, 2016


5/2/2013 12:48:00 PM
Horne's campaign finance charges could lead to state change
Tom Horne
Tom Horne

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services


PHOENIX -- A bid by Attorney General Tom Horne to escape campaign finance charges could upend all state laws limiting how much candidates can take.

Horne contends Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery has no jurisdiction to charge that he illegally coordinated his 2010 election effort with what was supposed to be an independent campaign finance committee. His attorney, Michael Kimerer, told Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Rea on Wednesday the complaint against Horne by Secretary of State Ken Bennett of an election law violation is required by statute to be referred to the Attorney General's Office.

At that point, Kimerer said, it would be up to Horne to conclude if he has a conflict of interest. Kimerer said he presumes that would be the case. But he said it is then Horne who gets to decide to whom to farm out the issue.

But Kimerer has a backup plan for his client: He also wants Rea to declare the statute limiting how much candidates can accept violated Horne's First Amendment rights because those limits are too low. If Rea agrees, that means the $840 limit on contributions from any one source that governed the 2010 campaign never existed.

That means it would not legally matter if Horne did coordinate with the committee run by Kathleen Winn on how she spent $513,340 for a last-minute television commercial on his behalf because he would be legally able to accept the money himself as a campaign donation.

More significant, a declaration the limits are unconstitutional means there are effectively no limits on how much all candidates can accept.

Horne has an unusual ally in his corner on this issue: Montgomery himself testified at the Legislature earlier this year he believes the current limits are "unconstitutionally low.'

State lawmakers responded by boosting those limits for future elections, in some cases by eightfold.

But the Citizens Clean Elections Commission is weighing a challenge because the measure did not get the three-fourths margin the commission claims is necessary to make that change. A successful challenge by the commission would leave only the current law -- the one Horne now is trying to void.

The issue stems from the 2010 race between Horne and Democrat Felecia Rotellini. Winn, who was part of Horne's campaign team for the GOP primary, formed Business Leaders for Arizona ahead of the general election.

With Horne facing last-minute attack ads funded by the Democratic Attorney General's Association, Winn bought a television commercial.

While the law allows independent campaign committees and they have no spending limits, Montgomery said an FBI inquiry found there had been illegal coordination between Horne and Winn's committee. Montgomery sent his findings to Bennett as the state's chief elections officer.

It's what happened then that is at issue.

Kimerer and Tim LaSota, who represents Winn, said state law requires Bennett to refer campaign finance allegations to the Attorney General's Office.

They said that makes the case Montgomery brought against Horne and Winn illegal. And they want Rea to halt the hearing scheduled for next week where an administrative law judge will consider whether the pair broke the law.

If found guilty, the penalty is a fine equal to three times the illegal contribution.

Deputy County Attorney Michael McVey told Rea that makes no sense, arguing various legal theories of how Bennett was entitled to give the case to Montgomery.

Rea agreed -- to a point.

"It's hard to argue that in this case the attorney general doesn't have about 1.5 million in substantial interests,' the judge said, referring to the possible fine.

But Rea said the law appears to be clear, though he did not issue a ruling Wednesday.

The judge did say, though, he needs to look at the contention there is no basis for a charge in the first place because of those campaign finance limits.

Kimerer claims Horne was running 12 points ahead of Rotellini before the Democratic attack ads. Those ads, Kimerer said, cost his client two-thirds of that lead but that Horne had limited funds what with that $840 cap.

"With those limits, he could not effectively respond to this devastating independent campaign against him, and his First Amendment rights were therefore violated,' Kimerer told Rea.

Kimerer pointed to a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision which struck down Vermont's $200 campaign finance limit on individual donors. And Justice Stephen Breyer specifically mentioned Arizona's limit -- then $760 -- as one of the seven lowest in the entire country, a mention Kimerer said makes it also ripe for Supreme Court review.

The Arizona law adopted earlier this year, the one pushed by Montgomery, removes all restrictions on how much any individual or political action committee can spend to influence elections. It also sharply increases how much donors can give to any one candidate and eliminates limits on how much candidates can accept from all sources.

It does not affect the amount available to candidates who use public funds for their campaigns. But Todd Lang, director of the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, said the laws on public and private financing are intertwined, and a change in one affects the other.

He pointed out public financing was approved by voters in 1998. And the Arizona Constitution allows alterations to voter-enacted laws only with a three-fourths vote of both the House and Senate, something this measure did not get.

ICT - Lamb Auto 0501 Nissan 180x150

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Marana man suffers skull injury, brain bleed following ATV crash (3260 views)

•   What's hot in Verde Valley job market? (3159 views)

•   Cornville man charged with child molestation seeks plea (3052 views)

•   Man arrested on numerous charges after crashing stolen motorcycle (2396 views)

•   Blaze erupts from panel van at gas station (2325 views)



Reader Comments

Posted: Sunday, May 5, 2013
Article comment by: itsy bitsy Spider

Isn't there already a bill to this effect wending its way through the legislature? And since when to judges get to decide how much is too little to fund a campaign?

However, I agree with Common Sense, here. The only way to reduce the influence of money on government is to reduce the amount of influence money can buy.


Posted: Friday, May 3, 2013
Article comment by: Common Sense Should Happen.

Gov (fed, state, local) should get out of business
of paying for campaigns, of limiting donations/
spendings of campaign, of forcing the reporting
of campaigns finance reports.

After all we all have a constitutional right of free
speach and free associations.




Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
HSE - Father Son Look a Like Contest
HSE - Readers Choice 300x100
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Yavapai Herbal Services

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, verdenews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved