LB - Yavapai Herbal Services

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : state May 26, 2016

2/26/2013 9:23:00 AM
Court: Victims cannot sue fraudster's abettors

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services

PHOENIX -- A new ruling Friday by the state's high court will bar victims of securities fraud from legally pursuing those who helped the people who defrauded them.

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court said there is no longer a right in this state to sue someone for aiding and abetting others in defrauding people. The justices said a strict reading of the wording of the Arizona Securities Act says it can be used only against those who "directly participated in the scheme.'

Attorney General Tom Horne said the ruling will have an impact.

"It will make it harder to recover' what has been stolen, he said.

"Usually its these other firms that have assets,' Horne explained. "Very often, the actual perpetrator doesn't have any assets left.'

What makes Friday's ruling all the more significant is that it overturns the precedent the court set more than 30 years ago when it interpreted the exact same law.

But Justice John Pelander, writing the decision, pointed out that the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 1994 ruling, said victims cannot use the federal Securities Exchange Act to sue those who do not themselves engage in manipulative or deceptive practices but only assist others in doing that.

Pelander said this case is the first to reach the Arizona Supreme Court since that ruling.

He said the Arizona law "tracks the language' of federal law. And based on that, Pelander and his colleagues concluded their 1979 decision allowing such suits is no longer good law.

Horne said Friday's ruling puts the issue into the hands of state lawmakers. He said it is up to them whether to add the words to the Arizona Securities Act that Pelander said are missing.

Rebecca Wilder, spokeswoman for the Arizona Corporation Commission, which regulates securities in the state, said staffers are still studying the ruling for its implications.

But the commission was so concerned about the issue that its attorneys filed their own legal pleadings with the state's high court asking the justices to leave Arizona caselaw the way it is -- or, now, the way it was -- calling it "critical for investor protection.'

"It allows injured investors the possibility to recover against those who assisted in harming them,' wrote commission attorney Julie Coleman. "Furthermore, secondary liability, including aider-abettor liability, for violations of the (state) act plays an important role in the commission's own enforcement actions.'

Coleman said there are several prime examples of how investors will be hurt.

One involves the failure of Baptist Foundation of Arizona.

Those lawsuits involved claims the foundation operated a Ponzi scheme, enticing new investors while using that money to make it look as if its holders were secure. The foundation eventually declared bankruptcy in 1999 after the commission ordered it to stop selling investments.

The accounting firm of Arthur Andersen was accused of helping the foundation misrepresent its financial condition by giving it a clean bill of health.

In a 2002 deal, the accounting firm agreed Friday to pay a record $217 million to settle all claims against it by the state and investors in the failure of the foundation.

That deal also required two top officers at Andersen's Arizona operations to give up their accounting licenses. And it required that the Phoenix office be monitored for two years, at company expense.

In another case, the commission went after attorney Gregory Groh in 2007, saying he aided and abetted in the sale of unregistered securities to his law clients by an insurance salesman and American Elder Group.

Coleman said Groh allowed the salesman to go to the homes of his estate planning clients under the guise of being a paralegal. Then Groh authorized the salesman to offer annuities and other insurance products to his law clients in exchange for a commission.

Pelander said the court, in interpreting statutes, must do that in a way to follow the intent of the Legislature.

He said that's easy when the plan text is clear. But in this case, Pelander said the justices must try to ascertain what lawmakers were trying to do, considering the effects and consequences, along with its spirit and purpose.

Here, Pelander wrote, nothing in the Arizona Securities Act specifically authorizes claims or liability for aiding and abetting in fraud. In contrast, he wrote, lawmakers have written other statutes that create liability for aiding and abetting in their commission, ranging from insurance fraud to obscenity.

"The Legislature, not the courts, should define the scope of liability under that statutory scheme,' the justice wrote.

Pelander conceded that Friday's ruling overturns the high court's earlier conclusions. But he said that U.S. Supreme Court decision on the parallel federal securities law provides "sufficient justification' to reverse course.

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Police soon will have one more reason to pull you over (4750 views)

•   What's hot in Verde Valley job market? (2956 views)

•   Cornville man charged with child molestation seeks plea (2875 views)

•   Marana man suffers skull injury, brain bleed following ATV crash (2737 views)

•   Motorcycle rider suffers head injuries in crash (2195 views)

Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, March 1, 2013
Article comment by: two cents

Is this another way our state governments trying to attract new businesses? More crooks running businesses because Arizona lawmakers have made fraud an unpunishable offense.
I wonder how much money and personal favors were exchanged 'under the table' for those rulings? What a bunch of crooks running this state!
just my two cents for what its worth

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: Gray Grammarian

Ah, the dangers of cribbing. Nevertheless, several of our legislators will have a legitimate reason to revise a bad piece of Federal legislation.

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: Crime Wave

Unbelievable and outrageous, this state believes in protecting white collar crime, and to prove it the state supreme court passes legislation doing just that.

What kind of justice exists in this state? We knew that big business was corrupt but I personally still had a little bit of faith in our judicial system. Now I know every branch of government including the judges are corrupt and being paid off to rule that way. Now the biggest question that remains is, how much did Walmart have to pay to get them to rule that way?

This isn't America anymore and especially in this state.

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: Foxes guarding hen houses

The big boy$ $ure know how to take care of each other.



Nudge nudge.


This will teach the dumb buyer to beware, right?

Posted: Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Article comment by: Let See, I Can Be...

arrested and punished if I drve the get-away-car
of a bank robbery....But if I assist a fraudster in
ripping off a bank, I will go untouched...Hmmm!

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
HSE - Father Son Look a Like Contest
HSE - Readers Choice 300x100
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Home Furnishings Direct 0519

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved