Yavapai College PAC - Monk

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Amazing Grapes | Yellow Pages | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : latest news August 20, 2014


4/26/2013 10:34:00 AM
Medicaid opponents claim governor's plan 'more socialism and bigger government'
Rep. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, leads a rally of legislators and others Thursday on the Capitol lawn against the plans by Gov. Jan Brewer to expand the state's Medicaid program by tapping into the funds from the Affordable Care Act. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)
Rep. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, leads a rally of legislators and others Thursday on the Capitol lawn against the plans by Gov. Jan Brewer to expand the state's Medicaid program by tapping into the funds from the Affordable Care Act. (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)
Sen. Kelli Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, explains her objections Thursday to the proposal by Gov. Jan Brewer to expand the state's Medicaid program. Ward, a doctor, called the care provided under the entire Medicaid program
Sen. Kelli Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, explains her objections Thursday to the proposal by Gov. Jan Brewer to expand the state's Medicaid program. Ward, a doctor, called the care provided under the entire Medicaid program "substandard." (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer)

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services


PHOENIX -- Foes of the governor's plan to expand the state's Medicaid program laid out their objections and alternatives Thursday, including one that actually would dump thousands of people from the program who are now getting care.

"We have a choice: More socialism and bigger government or more freedom and fiscal stability,' said Rep. Warren Petersen, R-Gilbert, one of the leaders of an ant-expansion rally on the Capitol lawn.

Sen. Kelli Ward, R-Lake Havasu City, called the care provided under Medicaid "substandard' and said entitlement programs like this "disincentivize the poor from improving themselves.'

And Rep. Justin Olson, R-Mesa, said an expanded Medicaid program means more tax dollars for family planning services to be paid to Planned Parenthood which has "this mission of terminating life before it's even born.'

Thursday's rally came as Senate President Andy Biggs, who also opposes what Gov. Jan Brewer wants to do, drew a line in the stand. He vowed to do all he can to not even allow a vote on her proposal.

Biggs' position does give him vast powers to sideline legislation.

"I'm not going to allow late introduction of a bill,' he told Capitol Media Services, pointing out the deadline for that was months ago. And Biggs said even if what the governor wants does end up at the Senate, whether from a House bill or an amendment to something else, "I never made a commitment I'd put it on the floor' for a vote.

House Speaker Andy Tobin has not taken such an absolute stand. But Tobin said he would not allow a vote in his own chamber on Brewer's plan as it now stands.

The Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, the state's Medicaid plan, makes coverage available for most individuals below the federal poverty level, about $19,500 a year for a family of three. The federal government provides $2 for every dollar of state funds.

Under the Affordable Care Act, states can expand up to 133 percent of the poverty level, with the federal government picking up virtually all of the additional cost.

Brewer figures Arizona could add about 300,000 to the AHCCCS rolls of 1.3 million. That includes about 140,000 childless adults below the poverty level who were getting care from the state but were dropped from the program, at Brewer's behest, to save money for the state.

More to the point, the governor contends that expanding coverage to 133 percent of the poverty level actually makes money: Its share would be paid by a tax on hospitals that actually would leave dollars left over.

Biggs, however, said the flaw in all that is the argument that the federal government actually will live up to its side of the bargain and provide the extra dollars for an expanded program.

One of the options presented is to simply no longer provide coverage to childless adults. That

affects not only the 140,000 who already have left the program but would actually end services to the estimated 63,000 who were in the program when the enrollment freeze was implemented in 2010 and are still getting care.

That idea drew fire from Brewer, who sent a letter to legislative leadership calling that option` `morally repugnant and fiscally irresponsible.' It would not, though, endanger the funds for the rest of the Medicaid program as federal law does not require states to provide coverage to childless adults.

But gubernatorial press aide Matthew Benson said Petersen is ignoring one fact: A 2000 ballot measure requires the state to provide free care for everyone below the federal poverty level, including childless adults.

Brewer, though, could have a hard time making that case in court -- especially as she argued just the opposite only two years ago.

It was Brewer who in 2010 pushed through the freeze on enrolling new childless adults, claiming the state just could not afford the cost. That resulted in a lawsuit by groups contending the move violates the specific direction of voters.

But Brewer's lawyers argued -- and the appellate courts agreed -- the 2000 measure simply requires the state to fund expanded care with tobacco taxes and Arizona's share of a nationwide settlement with tobacco companies.

The ballot measure does require lawmakers to supplement those dollars with other "available sources' of money. But the judges ruled the question of what funds are "available' is strictly a political one.

"In these circumstances, we are ill-equipped to inquire into and second-guess the complexities of decision-making and priority-setting that go into managing the state's budget,' appellate Judge Patricia Norris wrote.

Biggs said there is another option: have the state alone provide care for all childless adults.

"We have enough money in our 'rainy day' fund,' Biggs said, at least for the foreseeable future. "At bare minimum, we have three years to watch Obamacare implode around the nation while we don't have to suffer the same detrimental effects.'

And Biggs said there's another benefit to having that part of the program funded only by the state: No federal prohibition against things like co-pays and deductibles.

The stalemate on Medicaid is having ripple effects. Most notably, lawmakers cannot adopt a budget for the coming year because how much Arizona needs to set aside for health care costs depends on whether the state joins the expanded Medicaid program and taxes hospitals to pay the cost.




    Recently Commented     Most Viewed
Letters: Who is right is best satisfied by what is right (2 comments)
County votes 'No' on wolves (1 comment)
Cottonwood Elementary works to rectify AIMS stumble (8 comments)
AIMS scores mostly steady at area school districts (2 comments)
Editorial: Water, sewer rate hike a question of sooner or later (24 comments)


Reader Comments

Posted: Saturday, April 27, 2013
Article comment by: Glad Kelli Ward isn't my doctor

Me: "Dr. Ward, as you know I am a childless adult and don't have AHCCCS. How am I going to pay for my chemotherapy for this diagnosis of ovarian CA"?
Dr. Ward: "I'm truly sorry for that, if you would have improved yourself, you probably could have avoided CA. Just see that your affairs are in order and go back and give your family big, big hugs. Or..maybe some friends will have a fundraiser. I know this nice tavern......"


Posted: Friday, April 26, 2013
Article comment by: Slater Slater

As a registered independent I would
like 2 throw my towel in the ring and pick it up
full of $100 bills to throw in the crowd.
Vote for Slater and I promise I'll only steal 9.5% a quarter.Go ahead try to beat that.Vote
your conscience.(or not) lol
It's your last chance to place a meaningless vote.With documentation.


Posted: Friday, April 26, 2013
Article comment by: Slater Slater

Their expanding it by stealing back $100 in my case alone.Thats a month people.$1200
a year. Times a million just in Az. Oh what a
worry wart I am.Forget the whole thing.
Just raise the flag everyday and you are forgiven.
I know I'm On the hit list now.(lp albums) How
do I get out of this one.


Posted: Friday, April 26, 2013
Article comment by: The only flaw is these REP's grandstanding- for re-election by playing games -

The program is not even fully implemented- and most folks rates have been rising like warm dough in a summer kitchen anyhow.

Now if you think this is the highest and best use of our elected folks time... then hooty-hoo to you.

Otherwise- your slip may be showing and your face should be getting red...

Last we knew folks were sold a bill of goods than included Jobs-Jobs-Jobs.... not Protest... ?


Posted: Friday, April 26, 2013
Article comment by: The flaw in Obamacare

Even Obamacare's biggest supporters are now saying this the way this is being implemented is a "train wreck".

Republicans have been saying all along it's nothing more than a new entitlement that is not funded and that the country cannot afford.

Already we are seeing our health insurance premiums doubling and tripling over time. Obamacare has failed to make healthcare more affordable. It's taking us the other way.

For the states, the future liability of Obamacare's initial funding looks like more smoke and mirrors, here today, gone tomorrow. That's what happens when you run trillion dollar deficits every year like the Obama administration.

This is not a whole lot different than what our disgraced former congressman Rick Renzi used to do.

You may recall Renzi used to visit our local towns asking for a wish list of what pork earmarks he could provide from the federal goverment. Many of our towns bought into that hook line and sinker.

It was irresponsible and wrong then, and it is now. Fortunately, congress stopped the earmarks. But obviously the Obama administration hasn't.




Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. The email and phone info you provide will not be visible to the public. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to 1700 characters or less. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit your comment entries to five(5) per day.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Required
Last Name:
Required
Telephone:
Required
Email:
Required
Comment:
Required
Passcode:
Required
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.
   


Advanced Search

HSE - Pulse Research
HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast





Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
Yavapai Herbal Services

© Copyright 2014 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, verdenews.com ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2014 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved