LB - Felice Soldwedel Unit20 728x90

Home | Classifieds | Place Ad | Public Notices | Galleries | Kudos | Obits | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | Villager | Health Directory | Contact Us
The Verde Independent | Cottonwood, Arizona

home : latest news : latest news June 27, 2016

2/27/2013 11:40:00 AM
Legislative plan represents first step in banning invitro fertilization in Arizona

Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services

PHOENIX -- What's being billed as simply a legislative study of invitro fertilization could be the first step toward banning the process outright in Arizona.

The proposal by Sen. Nancy Barto, R-Phoenix, requires IVF clinics to provide the state with detailed information on everything from numbers of procedures performed and how many result in pregnancies to the number of embryos ultimately destroyed. SB 1376, set for debate and vote on the Senate floor, then would have a committee to decide what state regulation is necessary.

But Kristen Boilini who represents IVF clinics and the National Infertility Association said her clients fear something more sinister.

"We know that, for the interests and the proponents behind the bill, every embryo, anywhere, has rights,' she said.

Boilini cited one provision in SB 1376 which requires the study committee to consider the effects of IVF on "third parties,' including donors, the children conceived through IVF -- and the embryos themselves. And the panel will decide whether regulation is necessary to protect public health "or to protect the interests of third parties.'

She said that paves the way for giving the embryos legal status the state could protect.

Barto would not address questions about whether her measure is the first step toward Arizona prohibiting the destruction of unused embroys, a move that effectively could end IVF in Arizona. But she acknowledged the study committee is designed to do more than gather data.

"People will be concerned about what they hear and there may be proposed legislation,' she said. "Or we'll learn more about how it actually works and there won't be concerns.'

Anyway, Barto said, there needs to be some study about the effects on donors and children conceived through IVF. Beyond that is a question of the rights of the children to information about their biological parents.

"It's not always the father and the mother getting together and producing a child,' she explained. "It's sometimes a stranger and a stranger.'

She said fears about a hidden agenda have been "blown out of proportion.'

But that fear is buttressed by an alert sent out by Cathi Herrod, president of the Center for Arizona Policy, urging followers to urge their legislators to support SB 1376.

Herrod said there's nothing wrong with wanting to "bring new life into the world.'

"Unfortunately, the industry's 'success at all costs' approach may disregard the sanctity of human life at the embryonic stage of development,' her alert reads. And Herrod said while CAP has no formal position about IVF, "we are very concerned, as every pro-life person should be, about the human lives being sacrificed in the name of building a family.'

"Human life is being created,' Herrod separately told Capitol Media Services.

"Our public policy in this state clearly sets forth a pro-life point of view,' she continued. Herrod said the legislation will look into the practice, which has not been studied by lawmakers, "and determine whether there is a need to protect life or whether everything is fine and doesn't need a public policy response.'

At its basic level, the legislation requires IVF clinics to provide data to the state.

Boilini said much of this already is collected by the Centers for Disease Control. She said there is no reason to put a new burden on clinics when state health officials can get it from the federal agency.

But there are things in SB 1376 the CDC does not collect, including "selective abortion,' when a woman who has gone through IVF produces multiple fetuses and chooses to abort one or more. That process is known as "selective reduction.'

Boilini said IVF doctors do not do abortions or are involved with women at that stage.

"Yet if you don't report the data, there are criminal penalties in the bill,' she said, along with taking away a doctor's license to practice.

But it is that study committee that is giving Boilini the most heartburn, having the state look at the "benefits and costs' of IVF.

"The government doesn't pay for infertility treatment,' she said. "Where is the government's interest in doing a cost-benefit analysis on people being able to access infertility treatment?'

Barto sees the issue in broader terms. The study committee in SB 1376 would determine if regulation of IVF "is necessary to protect the public health or

Barto said that, if nothing else, a report detailing the number of embroys destroyed could create political support for new limits.

"We can, for sure, inform people that this is happening because pro-life people care about life from its earliest, from conception to natural death,' she said. "So it's part of the pro-life continuum that people understand what is happening in their communities.'

Lawmakers have pushed the issue before.

In 2010 the Legislature adopted a bill spelling out what information has to be provided to a woman before she can donate an egg for IVF. That includes hormones provided and the risks of the surgery.

Boilini said doctors here did not object because much of this already was required in federal law.

ICT - Lamb Auto 0601 Nissan 180x150

    Most Viewed     Recently Commented
•   Jerome Declares Emergency: Town under mandatory water restrictions (5842 views)

•   26 wildland fires currently burning in Arizona (2731 views)

•   Cottonwood forum explores long-term solutions to Verde homelessness (1674 views)

•   Cottonwood selects one new, one former, member to fill council vacancies (994 views)

•   Vacation rental reality: Will local taxes offset the impact? (926 views)

Reader Comments

Posted: Friday, March 1, 2013
Article comment by: Supreme Court and Common Sense know pre-borns are persons...

But there is a group who want us to ignore the
pre-borns' rights...and allow the killing of
the weakest amongst us.

How much longer will the killings...go on?

Posted: Friday, March 1, 2013
Article comment by: Common Sense

This is the most oppressive state in the country. The state supreme court rules you can't sue the businessmen for fraud if he sells you something, unsafe, unhealthy, or defective and that he knows is junk.

You can't have any children unless it is concieved in a way approved by the state. If you are raped or a victim of incest, or your child is going to be deformed and disabled then you are required to have that baby at a huge cost to everyone in the country, and especially that unwanted baby.

Personal freedom?, common sense, not in Arizona.

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: Mary Heartman

@ PF
I'm with you on this one. What is the problem here? With so many children who need a good home, I don't see the need for invitro fertilization. But were there complaints about the operation of these clinics? If not, why is the State involved?

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: Crime Wave

America land of the free? Yeah right.

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: P F

So, please let me hear again how republicants do not want big intrusive government interfering with people's lives.

Oops, they must mean they don't want government interference with them making money.

Ahhhh! I am beginning to see.

Posted: Thursday, February 28, 2013
Article comment by: What

WHY, it is not the states business to get into something this personal between a wife, husband and Dr. Pro Life groups don't need to know this either. What is going with our choices and privacy? this is just nuts

Article Comment Submission Form
Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comments are limited to Facebook character limits. In order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search

HSE - We want to hear from you
Find more about Weather in Cottonwood, AZ
Click for weather forecast

Submission Links
 •  Submit your feedback about our site

Find It Features Blogs Celebrate Submit Extras Other Publications Local Listings
Classifieds | Place Ad | Galleries | Kudos | Real Estate | Subscriber Services | e-News | RSS | Site Map | Find Verde Jobs | Contact Us
LB - Coldwell Banker 1019

© Copyright 2016 Western News&Info, Inc.® The Verde Independent is the information source for Cottonwood and Verde Valley area communities in Northern Arizona. Original content may not be reprinted or distributed without the written permission of Western News&Info, Inc.® Verde News Online is a service of WNI. By using the Site, ®, you agree to abide and be bound by the Site's terms of use and Privacy Policy, which prohibit commercial use of any information on the Site. Click here to submit your questions, comments or suggestions. Verde News Online is a proud publication of Western News&Info Inc.® All Rights Reserved.

Software © 1998-2016 1up! Software, All Rights Reserved